ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulation of immune checkpoints by electronic cigarette.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- BTLA: An Emerging Immune Checkpoint Target in Cancer Immunotherapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based immunotherapy has significantly improved survival in advanced melanoma. However, many patients exhibit resistance to these therapies. This study examines the impact of
methodsWe analyzed methylation and gene expression data from public datasets (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)) and an in-house cohort of melanoma patients treated with ICB therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. We developed a quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) assay to measure methylation levels of the cg24157392 and cg03995631 CpG sites, and a targeted bisulfite sequencing assay was used to validate the accuracy of qMSP. We measured BTLA protein expression using multiplex immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical staining methods. Pearson correlation, survival analysis, and immune cell infiltration estimation were conducted to explore the associations between
resultsHypomethylation at CpG sites cg24157392 and cg03995631 in the
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.