ArticleThorax2025
AI-powered evaluation of lung function for diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.
Article in Thorax, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in geriatric healthcare: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- SpiroLLM: Finetuning pretrained LLMs to understand spirogram time series with clinical validation in COPD reporting.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- The rise of artificial intelligence in respiratory primary care and pulmonology: a scoping review.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: advances, challenges and future directions.The European respiratory journal · 2026Review
- The role of multidisciplinary discussion in diagnosis and management of interstitial lung diseases: a retrospective evaluation of a single-center 10 years' of experience.La Radiologia medica · 2026Observational
- Artificial Intelligence Enabled Lung Sound Auscultation in the Early Diagnosis and Subtyping of Interstitial Lung Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- [Research Progress of Anti-lung Cancer Drug-related Interstitial Lung Disease].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Review
- Comparison of IOS and Body Plethysmography Findings in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.Tanaffos · 2025Article
- COPD-MMDDxNet: a multimodal deep learning framework for accurate COPD diagnosis using electronic medical records.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The Role and Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Function Tests: A Systematic Review.Current health sciences journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) can pose a challenge as the pulmonary function test (PFT) is only minimally affected at the onset. To improve early diagnosis, this study aims to explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) software in assisting pulmonologists with PFT interpretation for ILD diagnosis. The software provides an automated description of PFT and disease probabilities computed from an AI model. STUDY
methodsIn study phase 1, a cohort of 60 patients, 30 of whom had ILD, were retrospectively diagnosed by 25 pulmonologists (8 junior physicians and 17 experienced pneumologists) by evaluating a PFT (body plethysmography and diffusion capacity) and a short medical history. The experts screened the cohort twice, without and with the aid of AI (ArtiQ.PFT, V.1.4.0, ArtiQ, BE) software and provided a primary diagnosis and up to three differential diagnoses for each case. In study phase 2, 19 pulmonologists repeated the protocol after using ArtiQ.PFT for 4-6 months.
resultsOverall, AI increased the diagnostic accuracy for various lung diseases from 41.8% to 62.3% in study phase 1. Focusing on ILD, AI improved the detection of lung fibrosis as the primary diagnosis from 42.8% without AI to 72.1% with AI (p<0.0001). Phase 2 yielded a similar outcome: using AI increased ILD diagnosis based on primary diagnosis (53.2% to 75.1%; p<0.0001). ILD detections without AI support significantly increased between phase 1 and phase 2 (p=0.028) but not with AI (p=0.24).
interpretationThis study shows that AI-based decision support on PFT interpretation improves accurate and early ILD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.