Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40081879›Full record

SynthesisArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2025

Facilitators and barriers to the practice of neonatal family integrated care from the perspective of healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Nadia Leake, Sarah Edney, Nicholas Embleton, Janet Berrington, Judith Rankin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadia LeakePopulation Health Science Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK n.leake2@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7728-9901
Sarah EdneyPopulation Health Science Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4069-3505
Nicholas EmbletonPopulation Health Science Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Janet BerringtonNewcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Judith RankinPopulation Health Science Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to the practice of neonatal Family Integrated Care (FICare) from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs).

designA systematic search strategy was developed to identify qualitative studies exploring neonatal HCPs' views of any of the principles of FICare. Six literature databases (CINAHL, (Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched using the terms Healthcare Professionals, Neonatal, Environment, FICare, Education, Well-being, Culture, Partnership and Empowerment. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were thematically analysed.

results11032 titles and abstracts and 85 full-text papers were screened. Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and reported interviews with 1243 HCPs, predominantly nurses. Three themes were synthesised in relation to barriers and facilitators: (1) 'advocacy and acknowledgement', whereby HCPs are expected to advocate for the emotional and mental health of the whole family, not solely the baby's needs; (2) 'belief and behaviour', whereby the degree to which FICare is practised is dependent on HCPs' belief in its benefits in relation to other activities; (3) 'conditions and consistency', whereby a lack of space, resources, policy and consistent practice of FICare created apathy and contradictory approaches to care.

conclusionAlthough HCPs see value in FICare, successful implementation is multifactorial and requires the expectation to deliver FICare to be aligned with resourcing at the hospital, team and individual levels. Shifting the practice paradigm to FICare remains challenging for some HCPs. Greater understanding of HCPs' views on barriers, facilitators and how FICare practice impacts individuals is required.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornQualitative ResearchIntensive Care Units, NeonatalNeonatologyNursing CareQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40081879
PMCPMC12573369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.