Observational studyBMJ global health2025
Perioperative outcomes at three rural Rwandan district hospitals: a 28-day prospective observational cohort study.
Observational study in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe paucity of data on perioperative outcomes in low- and middle-income countries complicates the design and implementation of targeted interventions to improve the delivery of safe, affordable, accessible and timely surgical and anaesthesia care services. We assessed perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgical care at three Rwandan rural hospitals-Butaro District Hospital, Kirehe District Hospital and Rwinkwavu District Hospital-supported by Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima-an international non-governmental organisation.
methodsWe conducted a 6-month prospective observational cohort study at the three district hospitals. A validated electronic-based perioperative assessment tool was adapted for our setting to capture demographics and clinical information. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed using Stata V.15.1.
resultsA total of 3289 major surgeries were performed from January to September 2020 at the three hospitals. Overall, 3204 surgeries (97.5%) were performed on women; the median age was 27 years (IQR: 23-33), and emergency cases constituted 86.8% of all cases. Cases with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status of 3 or above had higher odds of having surgical or anaesthesia complications compared with cases with ASA status 1 (OR: 11.1, 95% CI: 2.7 to 45.8). Furthermore, emergency cases had 1.8 times higher odds of having a composite outcome (developing complications, surgical site infections or death) compared with elective cases (95% CI: 1.1 to 3.0).
conclusionOur findings highlight the need for improving surgical capacity, reinforcing infection prevention and control measures and leveraging electronic data capture for quality improvement to ensure safer surgery and anaesthesia care in rural Rwanda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.