Trial reportChest2025
Low-Intensity vs Moderate-Intensity Anticoagulation for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Strategies for Anticoagulation During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Pilot Trial.
Trial report in Chest, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04997265 (Strategies for Anticoagulation During Venovenous ECMO), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategies for Anticoagulation During Venovenous ECMO: The SAFE-ECMO Pilot Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of reduced-intensity or no heparin versus standard heparin anticoagulation in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Early vs Late Initiation of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Protocol for a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- Antithrombotic strategies and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- 60 years of ARDS and the evolution of extracorporeal lung support - from ECMO to ECCOIntensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of a dual-team collaboration model guided by chain management on ECMO initiation and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Different low activated clotting time target anticoagulation protocols for patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBleeding is a common and sometimes fatal complication of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Whether lowering the intensity of anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO is safe or effective is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is a large, multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO feasible? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsIn a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized pilot trial conducted at 3 centers across the United States, we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing venovenous ECMO to low-intensity or moderate-intensity anticoagulation. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment rate and adherence to the assigned anticoagulation strategy. The primary efficacy outcome was major bleeding, and the primary safety outcome was thromboembolic events, both assessed between enrollment and 24 hours after decannulation.
resultsAll of the 26 patients enrolled received the assigned intensity of anticoagulation. A major bleeding event occurred in 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group and in 4 of 14 patients (28.6%) in the moderate-intensity anticoagulation group (absolute risk difference, -20.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -48.6 to 8.1; P = .33). One patient experienced a thromboembolic event (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group compared with none in the moderate-intensity group (difference, 8.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.3 to 24.0; P = .46). No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events. No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events.
interpretationOur results indicate that enrollment and separation between groups are feasible in a multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation for critically ill adults receiving venovenous ECMO. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed and seems to be feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04997265; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.