ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2025
Multi-contrast 4DMR via MR multitasking: Early clinical experience and implication for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiver tumors have low contrast on 4DCT. A novel Multitasking (MT)MR imaging technique has been implemented on the MR simulator, providing both T1 and T2-weighted 4DMR images in a single 8-min free-breathing scan for better tumor delineation and motion evaluation. This study reports our early clinical experience of MTMR regarding tumor visibility, motion characteristics, and resultant dosimetry compared to post-contrast 4DCT for liver SBRT.
methodsPhantom motion validation was performed. Tumor contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and motion were analyzed in 54 patients. Replanning for 17 patients (21 tumor volumes) was performed, and planning target volume receiving greater than 90% of the prescription (PTV_V90) was compared based on optimized dose distributions for each 4D dataset-derived PTV.
resultsPhantom motions in both 4DCT and MTMR datasets were within <1.8 mm of the programmed ground truth. The absolute CNR of MTMR-T1w and MTMR-T2w were significantly greater than post-contrast 4DCT. Tumor superior-inferior motions were significantly greater in MTMR than in 4DCT, while PTV volumes were not significantly different between the two 4D datasets. The PTV_V90 calculated from individual MTMR-T1w and 4DCT optimized plans were similar. However, a statistically significant 5 % reduction of PTV_V90 was observed when the optimized PTV_MTMR dose was superimposed on the respective PTV_4DCT, or vice versa for the re-planning patient cohort.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that the MTMR sequence offers superior tumor visualization and detects greater superior-inferior motion compared to 4DCT, enhancing the precision of radiotherapy planning for liver SBRT. While both imaging methods achieve comparable target volume coverage with individually optimized plans, discrepancies in tumor positioning lead to reduced coverage when plans are cross-applied, highlighting the importance of motion assessment accuracy. MTMR's ability to provide multiple contrast-weighted images in a single scan addresses limitations of traditional 4DCT and multi-sequence MR protocols, particularly for patients unable to receive contrast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.