ArticleJournal of aging and physical activity2025
Perceptions About Dyadic Physical Activity Intervention for Rural-Dwelling People With Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Journal of aging and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesRural populations face an elevated risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias partially attributed to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity. The study gathered key community partners' perspectives about (a) feasibility of implementing the telerehabilitation physical activity behavioral (TPAB) intervention, a virtual program aimed at increasing daily stepping with sensor-based monitoring, and (b) necessary adaptions for implementation for rural-dwelling people with cognitive impairment and care partners (dyads).
methodsEleven rural-dwelling individuals (three medical providers, four older adults, and four care partners of individuals with mild cognitive impairment) in Nebraska were recruited for a focus group via fliers and word of mouth. The person-based approach was used to gain the perspectives of participants during a 1-hr group discussion regarding six dimensions of feasibility. Session transcriptions were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsParticipants highlighted the need to improve physical activity in the community and supported care partners receiving TPAB alongside individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Suggested modifications to TPAB included, establishing a local champion, integrating local resources, involving primary care providers, setting recruitment deadlines, using participant testimonies for recruitment, and emphasizing program individualization.
conclusionOverall, participants perceived TPAB was practical, feasible, and necessary for rural-dwelling participants with cognitive impairment and their care partners; however, several adaptations and the creation of the Cognitive Impairment Rural Community-TPAB are required to optimize rural implementation. Significance/Implications: There is an identified need for the TPAB intervention with outlined redesign approaches to facilitate intervention development and rural implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.