Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40081364›Full record

ArticleNeuron2025

Interpretable deep learning for deconvolutional analysis of neural signals.

Bahareh Tolooshams, Sara Matias, Hao Wu, Simona Temereanca, Naoshige Uchida, Venkatesh N Murthy, Paul Masset, Demba Ba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Vascular waveform analysis using Bayesian pulse deconvolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bahareh TolooshamsCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Computing + mathematical sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Sara MatiasCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Hao WuCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Simona TemereancaCarney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Naoshige UchidaCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Kempner Institute for the Study of Natural & Artificial Intelligence, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Venkatesh N MurthyCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Kempner Institute for the Study of Natural & Artificial Intelligence, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Paul MassetCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada; Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Montréal, QC H2S 3H1, Canada. Electronic address: paul.masset@mcgill.ca.
Demba BaKempner Institute for the Study of Natural & Artificial Intelligence, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: demba@seas.harvard.edu.

Funding

Stability and flexibility of neural representations in the ventral striatumR01DC017311 · NIDCD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI VENKATESH N MURTHY, Naoshige Uchida · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread adoption of deep learning to model neural activity often relies on "black-box" approaches that lack an interpretable connection between neural activity and network parameters. Here, we propose using algorithm unrolling, a method for interpretable deep learning, to design the architecture of sparse deconvolutional neural networks and obtain a direct interpretation of network weights in relation to stimulus-driven single-neuron activity through a generative model. We introduce our method, deconvolutional unrolled neural learning (DUNL), and demonstrate its versatility by applying it to deconvolve single-trial local signals across multiple brain areas and recording modalities. We uncover multiplexed salience and reward prediction error signals from midbrain dopamine neurons, perform simultaneous event detection and characterization in somatosensory thalamus recordings, and characterize the heterogeneity of neural responses in the piriform cortex and across striatum during unstructured, naturalistic experiments. Our work leverages advances in interpretable deep learning to provide a mechanistic understanding of neural activity.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAlgorithmsAnimalsCorpus StriatumDopaminergic NeuronsRewardThalamusdeconvolutiondictionary learningdopamineinterpretable representationnaturalistic tasksingle-trialsparse autoencoders

Identifiers

PMID40081364
PMCPMC12006907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.