ArticleNeuron2025
Interpretable deep learning for deconvolutional analysis of neural signals.
Article in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Region-specific weighting of sensory intensity and reward prediction error by dopamine signals.iScience · 2026Article
- Sparse component analysis: A method that uncovers separable computations within neural population activity.Neuron · 2026Article
- Perception and neural representation of intermittent odor stimuli in mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Beyond Feature Selection: Interpretable Machine Learning for Mechanistic Insights in Metabolomics.Biology · 2026Review
- Vascular waveform analysis using Bayesian pulse deconvolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- How 'Neural' is a Neural Foundation Model?ArXiv · 2026Article
- A multi-scale dual-stream fusion network for high-accuracy sEMG-based gesture classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread adoption of deep learning to model neural activity often relies on "black-box" approaches that lack an interpretable connection between neural activity and network parameters. Here, we propose using algorithm unrolling, a method for interpretable deep learning, to design the architecture of sparse deconvolutional neural networks and obtain a direct interpretation of network weights in relation to stimulus-driven single-neuron activity through a generative model. We introduce our method, deconvolutional unrolled neural learning (DUNL), and demonstrate its versatility by applying it to deconvolve single-trial local signals across multiple brain areas and recording modalities. We uncover multiplexed salience and reward prediction error signals from midbrain dopamine neurons, perform simultaneous event detection and characterization in somatosensory thalamus recordings, and characterize the heterogeneity of neural responses in the piriform cortex and across striatum during unstructured, naturalistic experiments. Our work leverages advances in interpretable deep learning to provide a mechanistic understanding of neural activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.