ArticleFamily medicine2025
An Evaluation of STFM's Academic Family Medicine Antiracism Learning Collaborative.
Article in Family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) antiracism task force created and led an Antiracism Learning Collaborative (ALC) to help STFM members identify racist structures and behaviors within their academic institutions and develop projects to become leaders for change. The Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care was tasked with evaluating whether the 2-year program's goals were met.
methodsThrough a call for applications, 20 dyads were accepted for participation. At least one dyad member had to be of a racial or an ethnic population that is underrepresented in the medical profession. Participant involvement took place from January 2022 through September 2023. The following data sources were evaluated: project plans, four survey sets, anecdotal meeting notes, mentor meeting forms, and final reports and presentations from the dyads.
resultsA total of 34 participants (17 dyads) completed the study from 17 institutions. Generally, participants learned several antiracism concepts and how to take steps to counter racist structures and behaviors through actionable approaches and language use. Strengths of the program were the tools and resources offered to dyads for their project implementation. Two major challenges were institutional opposition or lack of support and lack of time (both for dyads and for various local community partners).
conclusionsOverall, ALC met each goal. Future evaluations of similar initiatives should consider defining what success for individual projects looks like and provide a predefined rubric to gauge success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.