ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Factors Influencing the Intentions of Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases to Use a Digital Human for Medication Information: Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntroduction: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) frequently experience drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs can have negative health consequences and should be addressed promptly to prevent complications. A digital human, which is an embodied conversational agent, could provide medication-related information in a time- and place-independent manner to support patients in preventing and decreasing DRPs.
objectiveThis study aims to identify factors that influence the intention of patients with IRDs to use a digital human to retrieve medication-related information.
methodsA qualitative study with 3 in-person focus groups was conducted among adult patients diagnosed with an IRD in the Netherlands. The prototype of a digital human is an innovative tool that provides spoken answers to medication-related questions and provides information linked to the topic, such as (instructional) videos, drug leaflets, and other relevant sources. Before the focus group, participants completed a preparatory exercise at home to become familiar with the digital human. A semistructured interview guide based on the Proctor framework for implementation determinants was used to interview participants about the acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, costs, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability of the digital human. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically.
resultsThe participants included 22 patients, with a median age of 68 (IQR 52-75) years, of whom 64% (n=22) were female. In total, 6 themes describing factors influencing patients' intention to use a digital human were identified: (1) the degree to which individual needs for medication-related information are met; (2) confidence in one's ability to use the digital human; (3) the degree to which using the digital human resembles interacting with a human; (4) technical functioning of the digital human; (5) privacy and security; and (6) expected benefit of using the digital human.
conclusionsThe intention of patients with IRDs to use a novel digital human to retrieve medication-related information was influenced by factors related to each patient's information needs and confidence in their ability to use the digital human, features of the digital human, and the expected benefits of using the digital human. These identified themes should be considered during the further development of the digital human and during implementation to increase intention to use and future adoption. Thereafter, the effect of applying a digital human as an instrument to improve patients' self-management regarding DRPs could be researched.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.