ArticleJMIR AI2025
Improving the Robustness and Clinical Applicability of Automatic Respiratory Sound Classification Using Deep Learning-Based Audio Enhancement: Algorithm Development and Validation.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Deep Learning Approaches for Lung Disease Detection: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- ATF-MGIAM: Medically-guided interpretable attention mapping for robust pertussis cough sound recognition.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning techniques have shown promising results in the automatic classification of respiratory sounds. However, accurately distinguishing these sounds in real-world noisy conditions poses challenges for clinical deployment. In addition, predicting signals with only background noise could undermine user trust in the system.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of incorporating a deep learning-based audio enhancement preprocessing step into automatic respiratory sound classification systems to improve robustness and clinical applicability.
methodsWe conducted extensive experiments using various audio enhancement model architectures, including time-domain and time-frequency-domain approaches, in combination with multiple classification models to evaluate the effectiveness of the audio enhancement module in an automatic respiratory sound classification system. The classification performance was compared against the baseline noise injection data augmentation method. These experiments were carried out on 2 datasets: the International Conference in Biomedical and Health Informatics (ICBHI) respiratory sound dataset, which contains 5.5 hours of recordings, and the Formosa Archive of Breath Sound dataset, which comprises 14.6 hours of recordings. Furthermore, a physician validation study involving 7 senior physicians was conducted to assess the clinical utility of the system.
resultsThe integration of the audio enhancement module resulted in a 21.88% increase with P<.001 in the ICBHI classification score on the ICBHI dataset and a 4.1% improvement with P<.001 on the Formosa Archive of Breath Sound dataset in multi-class noisy scenarios. Quantitative analysis from the physician validation study revealed improvements in efficiency, diagnostic confidence, and trust during model-assisted diagnosis, with workflows that integrated enhanced audio leading to an 11.61% increase in diagnostic sensitivity and facilitating high-confidence diagnoses.
conclusionsIncorporating an audio enhancement algorithm significantly enhances the robustness and clinical utility of automatic respiratory sound classification systems, improving performance in noisy environments and fostering greater trust among medical professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.