Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40080812›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Prevalence of Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infection in Telehealth Versus Face-to-Face Consultations: Cross-Sectional Analysis of General Practice Registrars' Clinical Practice.

Yu Gao, Parker Magin, Amanda Tapley, Elizabeth Holliday, Jason Dizon, Katie Fisher, Mieke van Driel, Joshua S Davis, Andrew Davey, Anna Ralston and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yu GaoGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-8739-2475
Parker MaginGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8071-8749
Amanda TapleyGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1536-5518
Elizabeth HollidaySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4066-6224
Jason DizonClinical Research Design IT and Statistical Support Unit, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2450-8429
Katie FisherGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2256-2624
Mieke van DrielGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1711-9553
Joshua S DavisSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9864-5699
Andrew DaveyGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7547-779X
Anna RalstonGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4713-4930
Alison FieldingGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5884-3068
Dominica MoadGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2593-6038
Katie MulquineyGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2380-4787
Lisa ClarkeGP Training Medical Education, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Hobart, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-5290-0144
Alexandria TurnerGP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8558-5321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a global threat. Australia has high antibiotic prescribing rates with the majority of antibiotics prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) for self-limiting acute respiratory tract infection (ARTIs). Australian GP trainees' (registrars') prescribing for ARTIs may have been affected by the introduction of remunerated telehealth consultations in 2020. Understanding of the impact of telehealth on antibiotic stewardship may inform registrar educational programs.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing by GP registrars in telehealth versus face-to-face (F2F) consultations for common cold (upper respiratory tract infection [URTI]), bronchitis, sore throat, acute otitis media, and sinusitis.

methodsA cross-sectional analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, a multicenter inception cohort study of registrars' in-consultation clinical and educational experiences. Analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression using 2020-2023 ReCEnT data. The outcome variable was "antibiotic prescribed" for new presentations of URTI, acute sore throat, acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis, and acute otitis media. The study factor was consultation type (telehealth or F2F).

resultsA total of 2392 registrars participated (response rate=93.4%). The proportions of diagnoses that were managed via telehealth were 25% (5283/21384) overall, 19% (641/3327) for acute sore throat, 29% (3733/12773) for URTI, 21% (364/1772), for acute bronchitis, 4.1% (72/1758) for acute otitis media, and 27% (473/1754) for acute sinusitis. Antibiotics were prescribed for 51% (1685/3327) of sore throat diagnoses, 6.9% (880/12773) of URTI diagnoses, 64% (1140/1772) of bronchitis diagnoses, 61% (1067/1754) of sinusitis diagnoses, and 73% (1278/1758) of otitis media diagnoses. On multivariable analysis, antibiotics were less often prescribed in telehealth than F2F consultations for sore throat (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; P=.001), URTI (adjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81; P<.001), and otitis media (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84; P=.01). There were no significant differences for acute bronchitis (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.79-1.45; P=.66) or acute sinusitis (adjusted OR 1, 95% CI 0.76-1.32; P=.99).

conclusionsGP registrars are less likely to prescribe antibiotics for sore throat, URTI, and otitis media when seeing patients by telehealth versus F2F. Understanding the reason for this difference is essential to help guide educational efforts aimed at decreasing antibiotic prescribing by GPs for conditions such as ARTIs where they are of little to no benefit. There was no evidence in this study that telehealth consultations were associated with greater registrar antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs. Therefore, there is no deleterious effect on antibiotic stewardship.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug PrescriptionsGeneral PracticePractice Patterns, Physicians'Respiratory Tract InfectionsTelemedicineAcute DiseaseAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOtitis MediaPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial Agentsacute otitisacute respiratory tract infectionantibioticsantibiotics stewardshipantimicrobial resistanceAustraliabronchitisconsultationsgeneral practicein-consultationprescriptionregistrarsrespiratory tract infectionRTIssinusitissore throatteleconsultteleconsultationtelehealthupper respiratory tract infection

Identifiers

PMID40080812
PMCPMC11950701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.