ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025
Is segmentectomy potentially adequate for clinical stage IA3 non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Factors Associated with Surgical Complexity and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Robotic Anatomical Segmentectomy.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Outcomes After VATS Single Versus Multiple Segmentectomy for cT1N0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Oncological Outcome of Minimally Invasive Single-Port Segmentectomy Compared to Lobectomy for Stage IA Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Choosing between lobectomy or segmentectomy: moving beyond the two-centimetre debate.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to identify the feasibility of segmentectomy for clinical stage IA3 (cIA3) vs cIA1-2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsWe retrospectively analysed data of consecutive patients with segmentectomy for cIA NSCLC across three centres between January 2017 and December 2022. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) was employed to minimize potential confounding in baseline characteristics. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) differences were examined using Kaplan-Meier estimator with the log-rank test. The Cox regression model was applied to assess the average treatment effect (ATE) between two groups in RFS. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsOf a total of 589 patients who underwent segmentectomy, 478 presented with cIA1-2 NSCLC while 111 presented with cIA3 NSCLC. In comparison with cIA1-2 cases, the cIA3 cohort were significantly older with poorer lung function and more comorbidity. The cIA3 NSCLC presented significantly invasive characteristics, with extensive tissues dissected. After median follow-up of 24.0 (interquartile range 12.5-40.1) months, we did not observe significant difference in RFS (3-year 73.4% vs 78.5%, P = 0.490; ATE: 1.17) between the cIA3 vs cIA1-2 groups. These findings were corroborated following the stabilized IPTW. Preoperative characteristics in the cIA3 subgroup were not related to RFS. In the sensitivity analysis, no difference in RFS was found between the two groups stratified by peripheral and central localization.
conclusionsIn well-selected patients with cIA3 NSCLC, segmentectomy leads to no statistical difference in oncologic outcomes compared to those observed in earlier stages in a relatively short follow-up period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.