ArticlePhysical therapy2025
Treatment Decision-Making for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture From the Perspective of Physical Therapists in Australia: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- No Difference in Return-to-Sport Rate or Activity Level in People with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Managed with ACL Reconstruction or Rehabilitation Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Pooled it
- Factors Influencing Consultant Knee Surgeons' Decision Making in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Management in Athletes: An International Delphi Study.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Traumatic knee injury healthcare pathways and outcomes: the Australian Knee Injury Inception Cohort Study (KIICS) protocol.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceIn Australia, few people with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture are managed with rehabilitation alone despite clinical trials demonstrating similar outcomes to ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The reasons for the low uptake of rehabilitation alone for the treatment of acute ACL rupture in Australia are unclear.
objectivesThe objectives of this study were to evaluate physical therapists' beliefs and the information they provide to patients about treatment options for ACL rupture, and to explore ACL rupture treatment decision-making from the perspective of physical therapists.
designThe design was a mixed-methods convergent parallel design comprising an Australia-wide survey (n = 246) and semi-structured interviews (n = 10).
participantsParticipants included physical therapists who manage people with ACL rupture in Australia. MAIN OUTCOMES: The survey contained 41 items that assessed demographics, treatment of ACL rupture, referral pathways, treatment beliefs, and the information provided to patients with ACL rupture.
resultsPhysical therapists' beliefs about treatment options varied and did not always reflect the information they provided to patients. Although 60% agreed that ACLR and rehabilitation-alone result in similar outcomes on average, only 37% reported regularly informing patients about this. To return to pivoting/contact sport, 23% believed that ACLR was required and 79% informed patients that ACLR was the best treatment to do so. Physical therapists felt that rehabilitation-alone is underutilized as a treatment for ACL rupture. Physical therapists encountered barriers to offering and providing rehabilitation-alone for ACL rupture, reflected in 7 qualitative themes: preference for surgery reflecting societal beliefs; more weight given to surgeon's opinion; unbalanced information from surgeon; referral pathways; uncertain recovery timeline; beliefs about treatment suitability; and knowledge and experience.
conclusionsPhysical therapists had mixed beliefs about treatment options and the information provided to patients was not always evidence based. Physical therapists felt that nonsurgical management was underutilized, and experienced barriers to offering and providing non-surgical management of ACL rupture in clinical practice. RELEVANCE: Informed decision-making can only occur if accurate, evidence-based information about ACL rupture treatment options is provided to patients. These findings may be used to guide professional development for physical therapists and inform strategies to improve evidence uptake by physical therapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.