ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2025
The influence of saccade target status on the reference frame of object-location binding.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top-down motivation both decreases and increases feature interference following a saccade.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Article
- Spatiotemporal predictability of saccades modulates postsaccadic feature interference.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Maintaining visual stability in naturalistic scenes: The roles of trans-saccadic memory and default assumptions.Cognition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to maintain stability across saccades, the visual system must keep track of nonspatial information bound to each location (object-location binding). Here, we investigated whether saccade target status affects the reference frame of trans-saccadic object-location binding. Previous studies examining the reference frame of object-location binding showed that peripheral, nonsaccade target objects are naturally bound to retinotopic, not spatiotopic, coordinates. But real-world saccades are generally directed toward objects of interest: Might trans-saccadic object-location binding occur in more ecologically relevant spatiotopic coordinates for saccade target objects? We adopted a modified spatial congruency bias paradigm, in which participants were asked to judge if two objects have the same or different identity. A saccade between object presentations was directed either toward the first object's location (saccade target condition) or to another location (saccade-elsewhere and saccade-away conditions). Across three preregistered experiments, we found primarily retinotopic object-location binding in the saccade-elsewhere and saccade-away conditions, but coexisting spatiotopic and retinotopic binding in the saccade target condition. The results indicate that saccade target objects can be additionally bound to spatiotopic coordinates across saccades and that it is the saccade target status specifically that allows an object to be additionally bound to spatiotopic coordinates. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of saccade target objects in maintaining stability across saccades, allowing for object-location binding to be encoded and/or remapped in stable spatiotopic coordinates. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.