ArticlePloS one2025
Ecological footprints, global sustainability, and the roles of natural resources, financial development, and economic growth.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevailing ecological deficit is devastating the ecosystem which is leading toward the unsustainability by endangering the livings on earth. The important drivers of this environment degradation are natural resources depletion, financial development and the economic growth which are investigated to test their impact on ecological footprints. The EKC hypothesis is evaluated to test the growth led environment pattern. This study incorporated twenty years (2002-2021) data of 146 countries and the group of countries are investigated into various quantiles, geographical regions and income wise groups formed by the World Bank. Keeping in view the heterogeneous data established through the Shapiro-Francia W test and graphical analysis, the panel quantile regression is used which is insensitive to heterogeneous data. Firstly, the impact of dependent variables is estimated on environment degradation using the 10th, 20th, 30th,40th, 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th, 90th and 99th quantiles. The results suggested that the natural resources depletion and financial development are deteriorating the ecological footprints, which varies from smaller in initial quantiles to large in later quantiles. NR in North America and FD in the Middle East & North Africa are severely deteriorating the environment quality. The economic growth is improving the ecology in East Asia and the Pacific. The negative impact of natural resources on environment degradation is found in all income groups albeit with varying intensities. The financial development in upper middle income and lower middle income groups is deteriorating the environment quality. The EKC hypothesis remained undetermined for the estimated quantiles and geographical regions whereas it is established in high income group only. The policy intervention is recommended to restrict the natural resources depletion and binding the credit facilities to invest in ecosystem friendly projects by curtailing the process of ecological deficit for global sustainability which may be initiated from the most environment degraded quantiles, geographical region and income group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.