ArticlePloS one2025
Disparities in use of physical restraint and chemical sedation in the emergency department by patient housing status.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA growing body of research has found there to be disproportionate physical restraint and chemical sedation use for historically marginalized populations in the emergency department (ED). This association has been examined with regard to patient race, ethnicity, sex, and age. Preliminary research has highlighted the ways in which unhoused status may also relate to the use of physical restraint and chemical sedation in the ED. Given the adverse health outcomes associated with these methods in the ED, further research is needed to explore the relationship between patient housing status and physical restraint/chemical sedation use in more depth.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of all ED visits among patients aged 18 years of age and older presenting to eight hospitals within a regional healthcare network in New England between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2021. Descriptive statistics and mixed effects logistic regression models nesting by patient were used to characterize the relationship between housing status and likelihood of restraint and/or sedation use.
findingsRestraint orders were found in 3,160 (5.7%) visits by unhoused patients, compared to 44,155 (1.5%) for housed patients. Unhoused status was significantly associated with restraint/sedation use (adjusted odds ratio = 1.45, 95% CI 1.36-1.54).
conclusionOur study identified a significant association between housing status and ED restraint and sedation use after adjusting for demographic factors and chief complaints. This finding has important implications pertaining to the care of unhoused patients in the ED and for examination of structural factors like housing status and their impact on psychiatric emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.