Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40080467›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploring a long short-term memory for mountain flood forecasting based on watershed-internal knowledge graph and large language model.

Songsong Wang, Ouguan Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Songsong WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1234-2484
Ouguan XuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences of China 22YJCZH162Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LZJWZ23E090001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The water levels associated with mountain floods exhibit rapid fluctuations within small watersheds, necessitating extensive data on various factors influencing such disasters to facilitate real-time forecasting. This study investigates the application of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for mountain flood forecasting, designing a watershed-internal Knowledge Graph (KG) and Large Language Model (LLM) that encompass watershed relationships and internal information structures. We have developed a hydrological KG for the Qixi Reservoir and Qiaodongcun forecasting points located in Zhejiang Province, China, to systematically organize water conservancy data, identify significant disaster-related factors, optimize the input hydrological data, and determine the most effective combination of input data for forecasting water levels. Additionally, we have implemented Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) for comparative analysis with LSTM. The findings indicate that the LSTM model, when integrated with the watershed-internal KG and LLM, can effectively incorporate critical elements influencing water level changes, the accuracy of the LLM-KG-LSTM model is enhanced by 3% compared to the standard LSTM model, and the LSTM series outperforms both RNN and GRU models, Our method will guide future research from the perspective of focusing on forecasting algorithms to the perspective of focusing on the relationship between multi-dimensional disaster data and algorithm parallelism.

Indexed as

FloodsModels, TheoreticalChinaForecastingHumansLarge Language ModelsLong Short Term MemoryNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40080467
PMCPMC11906063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.