ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring a long short-term memory for mountain flood forecasting based on watershed-internal knowledge graph and large language model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The water levels associated with mountain floods exhibit rapid fluctuations within small watersheds, necessitating extensive data on various factors influencing such disasters to facilitate real-time forecasting. This study investigates the application of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for mountain flood forecasting, designing a watershed-internal Knowledge Graph (KG) and Large Language Model (LLM) that encompass watershed relationships and internal information structures. We have developed a hydrological KG for the Qixi Reservoir and Qiaodongcun forecasting points located in Zhejiang Province, China, to systematically organize water conservancy data, identify significant disaster-related factors, optimize the input hydrological data, and determine the most effective combination of input data for forecasting water levels. Additionally, we have implemented Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) for comparative analysis with LSTM. The findings indicate that the LSTM model, when integrated with the watershed-internal KG and LLM, can effectively incorporate critical elements influencing water level changes, the accuracy of the LLM-KG-LSTM model is enhanced by 3% compared to the standard LSTM model, and the LSTM series outperforms both RNN and GRU models, Our method will guide future research from the perspective of focusing on forecasting algorithms to the perspective of focusing on the relationship between multi-dimensional disaster data and algorithm parallelism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.