SynthesisInfection2025
The added value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in central nervous system infections: a systematic review of case reports.
Synthesis in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meeting the future at the Munich conference ESCMID-Global 2026.Infection · 2026Article
- Article
- Complementary mNGS and traditional testing for bloodstream infections.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Neurobrucellosis with negative serological examination: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Detection and Management of Invasive Mold Disease in Pediatric Hematological Cancer Patients.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe diversity of pathogens causing central nervous system (CNS) infections presents a diagnostic challenge. Patient demographics and geographical location affect the likelihood of certain pathogens causing infection. Current diagnostic methods rely on labour-intensive cultivation or targeted detection. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promising tool for detecting pathogens in CNS infections, offering an unbiased approach. To enhance our understanding of patient demographics and the range of pathogens identified through mNGS, we conducted a systematic review of case reports.
methodsThe PubMed database was searched in March 2024. Case reports on CNS infections and mNGS published from January 2014 through February 2024 were included based on predefined criteria.
resultsThe search yielded 649 articles, of which 76 were included, encompassing 104 patients. Most patients were male (75%), the median age was 31,5 years [0-75] and 28% were immunocompromised. The most common diagnosis was encephalitis (36%), followed by meningitis (23%) and meningoencephalitis (22%). 53 unique pathogens were identified, comprising 27 different viruses, 19 bacteria, 5 parasites, and 2 fungi. Syndromic encephalitis/meningitis panels would only have detected four of the viruses and five of the bacteria. Additionally, 14 of the bacterial species are considered slow-growing or fastidious and could be challenging to detect by culture.
conclusionThe application of mNGS in diagnosing CNS infections reveals the diversity of pathogens responsible for these severe infections, thereby improving diagnostics and facilitating targeted treatment. While case reports may be subjected to bias, they provide valuable insights into the use of mNGS in this clinical context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.