ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Evaluating the impact of a navigation system on the initial cases of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer presents challenges for novice surgeons owing to the lack of tactile feedback, particularly during complex procedures, such as lymph node dissection. To address these issues, a vascular navigation system was developed to enhance procedural safety and efficiency by providing three-dimensional vascular and anatomical guidance. We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients who underwent robotic distal gastrectomy at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: those without navigation support (noRUS) and those with a vascular navigation system (RUS). We compared the dissection time, number of lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved, C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 3 (CRPD3), and postoperative recovery status. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed. The RUS group demonstrated significantly shorter dissection times (179.85 ± 6.88 vs. 204.87 ± 9.60 min, p = 0.0478) and higher LN retrieval (41.81 ± 2.77 vs. 30.96 ± 2.31, p = 0.0048). The CRPD3, a marker of surgical trauma, was significantly lower in the RUS group (8.27 ± 0.85 vs. 11.68 ± 1.13 mg/dL, p = 0.0184). Moreover, no significant differences were observed in the complication rates or postoperative recovery. The vascular navigation system significantly improved surgical efficiency and LN retrieval and reduced surgical trauma during robotic gastrectomy. This study is the first to evaluate the impact of the navigation system on novice surgeons, highlighting its potential to overcome the learning curve earlier and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40080316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.