ArticleJournal of ultrasound2025
Diagnostic reliability of duplex venous ultrasound for catheter-related thrombosis performed by a general intensive care nurse.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIt has been shown that general intensive care nurses are able to perform an examination of the deep venous system of the lower extremities for the diagnosis of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) using a compression ultrasound test with a high degree of reliability. (Skulec et al. in Eur J Intern Med 76:130-131, 2020) Another challenge for the use of vascular point-of-care ultrasound in intensive care is the diagnosis of central venous catheter-related thrombosis. It is a common problem that is often underdiagnosed. Due to the simplicity of the examination and the possible link with nursing care of inserted central venous catheters, this may be another potential diagnostic competency for critical care nurses. METHODOLOGY: Before the start of the study, each nurse participating in the study completed a two-hour training in duplex ultrasonography and examined 5 patients under supervision. Then patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) included in the study, underwent a duplex ultrasound performed by a nurse. Within 24 h, the examination was repeated by the ICU doctor. In the case of catheter insertion into the internal jugular vein (VJI) or the subclavian vein (VSC), the jugular vein, subclavian vein, and axillary vein (VA) were examined bilaterally. When the catheter was inserted into the femoral vein (VF), the patients were subjected to a duplex ultrasound of the femoral vein and the popliteal vein (VP) of both lower limbs. The examination results of each patient were blinded until both tests were performed. Calculations were used to evaluate the reliability of the test.
resultA total of 160 patients aged 62.9 ± 12.3 years were included. In our sample, the prevalence of CRT was found to be 41%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of examinations performed by general intensive care nurses were 90.8%, 97.1%, 91.8%, 96.8%, and 95.5%, respectively.
conclusionThe results of our study suggest that general ICU nurses are able to perform inpatient CRT duplex ultrasound with excellent specificity but only moderate sensitivity after a short, predefined training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.