Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40080309›Full record

ArticleBrain tumor pathology2025

CLINICAL utility of assessing CDKN2A status in recurrent astrocytomas.

Hemlata Jangir, Sahil Yadav, M B Hayagrivas, Jyotsna Singh, Sumanta Das, Saumya Sahu, Charli Roy, Mehar Chand Sharma, Chitra Sarkar, Ashish Suri and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain tumor pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hemlata Jangir *Neuropathology Laboratory, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sahil Yadav *All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
M B Hayagrivas *All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jyotsna SinghNeuropathology Laboratory, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sumanta DasNeuropathology Laboratory, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Saumya SahuNeuropathology Laboratory, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Charli RoyNeuropathology Laboratory, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mehar Chand SharmaNeuropathology Laboratory, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Chitra SarkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashish SuriDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vaishali SuriNeuropathology Laboratory, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. surivaishali@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-8194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IDH-mutant astrocytomas exhibit a more indolent natural history and better prognosis compared to their IDH-wild type counterparts. WHO 2021 classification integrated CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion as a crucial criterion for grading these tumors, emphasizing its prognostic implications. FISH assay is commonly used to assess CDKN2A status, but guidelines for interpreting FISH results for glioma prognostication are not well-defined in the literature. We conducted an ambispective study involving 22 cases of recurrent IDH-mutant astrocytomas, including primary tumor samples. Histopathological assessments, including WHO grading and molecular profiling, were performed. Immunohistochemistry confirmed IDH mutation status, and FISH analysis evaluated CDKN2A homozygous deletion. Homozygous CDKN2A deletion was detected in only 1/22 (4.8%) of primary tumors, which was grade 3 astrocytoma, and significantly more frequent in recurrent cases, particularly in histological grade 2/3 tumors (35.3%). Patients harboring CDKN2A deletions exhibited significantly poorer overall survival, highlighting its prognostic significance. Our findings highlight the clinical relevance of CDKN2A assessment in recurrent IDH-mutant astrocytomas and its utility as a prognostic marker. We propose a selective approach to FISH testing, focusing on primary grade 3 and all recurrent cases, regardless of histology grade, to optimize diagnostic accuracy and stratification for personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Gene DeletionAdultFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedMutationPredictive Value of TestsSurvival AnalysisCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16AstrocytomaCDKN2AFISHIDH-mutant astrocytomaRecurrent astrocytoma

Identifiers

PMID40080309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.