ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025
Action intersectorielle locale pendant la pandémie de COVID-19: une démarche de développement territorial en milieu rural.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic affected the action of collaborative networks, connecting organizations from the public, community, and private sectors. Intersectoral action is a recognized strategy for tackling complex problems and reducing social inequalities. This study aims to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic modified local intersectoral action to improve the living conditions of rural populations.
methodsData for this qualitative, case study were collected through semi-structured individual interviews, observation sessions, and documentary analysis. Actor-network theory was used as the theoretical framework. Data collection took place from March 2021 to June 2022. The data were processed using a thematic analysis inspired by the analytical framework.
resultsThe pandemic disrupted local intersectoral action, hampering networking operations and promoting a sectoral approach. Strategies favouring networking (use of technology and the liaison work of collective stakeholders) made it possible to create spaces for negotiating shared interests, identifying common causes, committing players to new roles, and sharing resources.
conclusionWhen faced with disruptions, networks can be flexible, testifying to the relevance of intersectoral action to meet the needs of the population. Even if the network was in a state of near-fragmentation before the pandemic, its reconstitution and remobilization were relatively easy for the community organizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.