Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40080225›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

RadLex and SNOMED CT integration: a pilot study for standardising radiology classification.

Merit Marquis, Igor Bossenko, Peeter Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Merit MarquisTallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia. merit.marquis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8609-8923
Igor BossenkoTallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Peeter RossTallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective communication and information exchange across diverse platforms are critical in healthcare data systems. However, the presence of multiple coding systems and varying standards creates discrepancies and misalignments, highlighting the need for innovative solutions to address these challenges.

objectiveThe study aimed to develop a technical and semantic interoperability method specifically for radiology procedures, utilising the terminology management tool TermX to facilitate efficient data exchange and utilisation in healthcare.

resultsThe study resulted in a revised RadLex data model using SNOMED CT, accompanied by a mapping guide and a classification system for X-ray and angiography procedures. This classification system consists of nineteen distinct properties, each defined by specific value sets derived from SNOMED CT terminology. A total of 380 concepts were utilised to describe the 622 procedures examined comprehensively.

conclusionThrough twelve design cycles involving in-depth analysis and iterative refinement, the mapping of angiography and X-ray procedures was successfully achieved, culminating in the creation and validation of a universal model that enhances both primary and secondary data collection. The efficacy and innovation of this system pave the way for further advancements in healthcare interoperability. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The innovative integration achieved in this study for standardising radiology classification promises to improve data management practices and enhance patient care outcomes through increased interoperability within the healthcare sector. KEY POINTS: A universal radiology procedure model to enhance capture would be valuable. A tool to facilitate technical and semantic interoperability for efficient data exchange in healthcare was created. This system could pave the way for futher advancements in healthcare interoperability.

Indexed as

Data captureInteroperabilityLOINCRadiologySNOMED

Identifiers

PMID40080225
PMCPMC11906921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.