ArticleAnimal cognition2025
Training and transfer test to study the referential understanding of conspecific photographs by goats.
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Touchscreen Tasks for Cognitive Testing in Domestic Goats (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individual recognition requires animals to compare available cues with stored information. For goats, living in stable social groups and forming social hierarchy, it is reasonable to assume they can discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics. This study focuses on the cognitive mechanisms underlying goats' perception of conspecific photographs, particularly whether they demonstrate image equivalence. Two groups of goats were trained to discriminate between portrait photographs of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics. The goats in group A (n = 12) were trained to select familiar individuals, whereas the goats in group B (n = 12) were trained to select unfamiliar individuals. Subsequent transfer test was conducted to assess their ability to generalise learned preferences to novel photographs of previously unseen goats. During the first training tasks (Tr1 and Tr2), no differences in learning performance between the two groups were observed. However, in the later tasks (Tr3 and Tr4), the goats in Group A exhibited better learning performance than did those in Group B. In the transfer test, five goats in Group A, but only one goat in Group B, demonstrated preferences for novel familiar or unfamiliar conspecifics. The superior performance of Group A goats in Tr3 and Tr4 and the number of goats that successfully transferred the familiarity concept to novel individuals provide compelling evidence for the formation of true image equivalence. While goats can establish image equivalence through familiarity, the abstraction of unfamiliar concepts is a more challenging cognitive task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.