Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40080179›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026

Absence of chest discomfort in type 1 NSTEMI patients: predictors and impact on outcome.

J Michael Altstidl, Merve Günes-Altan, Maximilian Moshage, Florian Weidinger, Lennart Lorenz, Dominik Weimann, Christina Chapuzot, Monique Tröbs, Mohamed Marwan, Stephan Achenbach and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J Michael AltstidlDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7395-8151
Merve Günes-AltanDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Maximilian MoshageDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Florian WeidingerDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Lennart LorenzDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Dominik WeimannDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Christina ChapuzotDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Monique TröbsDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Mohamed MarwanDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Stephan AchenbachDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Luise GaedeDepartment of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. luise.gaede@uk-erlangen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe absence of chest discomfort has been hypothesized to delay treatment and consequently result in worse outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

methodsIn 888 consecutive patients with type 1 NSTEMI, symptoms were systematically classified as chest discomfort defined as chest pain or pressure, dyspnea or other symptoms, e.g. epigastric pain. Patient characteristics predictive for the absence of chest discomfort and the impact of the symptom type on adverse in-hospital events (all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, and mechanical ventilation) were analyzed.

resultsChest discomfort was reported in 81.0%, dyspnea without chest discomfort in 12.2%, and only other symptoms in the remaining 6.9% of patients. In a multivariable regression analysis, female sex (p = 0.035), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003), the absence of any family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (p = 0.002), anemia (p < 0.001), and atrial fibrillation or flutter at presentation (p = 0.017) were independent predictors for the absence of chest discomfort. The absence of chest discomfort was associated with a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events (10.6% for chest discomfort vs. 29.6% for dyspnea and 27.9% for other symptoms, p < 0.001), which appeared partially mediated (p = 0.044) by longer times from diagnosis to invasive management (p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn type 1 NSTEMI, the absence of chest discomfort is associated with a higher rate of adverse in-hospital events. Women, diabetics, patients without a family history of CAD, patients with anemia, and patients with atrial fibrillation are more likely to present without chest discomfort and special attention may be required to avoid delayed invasive management in these patients.

Indexed as

Chest PainDyspneaNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionAgedElectrocardiographyFemaleGermanyHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsDisparitiesIn-hospital outcomesNon-ST-elevation myocardial infarctionRegistrySymptoms

Identifiers

PMID40080179
PMCPMC13562127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.