ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Absence of chest discomfort in type 1 NSTEMI patients: predictors and impact on outcome.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe absence of chest discomfort has been hypothesized to delay treatment and consequently result in worse outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
methodsIn 888 consecutive patients with type 1 NSTEMI, symptoms were systematically classified as chest discomfort defined as chest pain or pressure, dyspnea or other symptoms, e.g. epigastric pain. Patient characteristics predictive for the absence of chest discomfort and the impact of the symptom type on adverse in-hospital events (all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, and mechanical ventilation) were analyzed.
resultsChest discomfort was reported in 81.0%, dyspnea without chest discomfort in 12.2%, and only other symptoms in the remaining 6.9% of patients. In a multivariable regression analysis, female sex (p = 0.035), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003), the absence of any family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (p = 0.002), anemia (p < 0.001), and atrial fibrillation or flutter at presentation (p = 0.017) were independent predictors for the absence of chest discomfort. The absence of chest discomfort was associated with a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events (10.6% for chest discomfort vs. 29.6% for dyspnea and 27.9% for other symptoms, p < 0.001), which appeared partially mediated (p = 0.044) by longer times from diagnosis to invasive management (p < 0.001).
conclusionsIn type 1 NSTEMI, the absence of chest discomfort is associated with a higher rate of adverse in-hospital events. Women, diabetics, patients without a family history of CAD, patients with anemia, and patients with atrial fibrillation are more likely to present without chest discomfort and special attention may be required to avoid delayed invasive management in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.