ReviewIUCrJ2025
Small but mighty: the power of microcrystals in structural biology.
Review in IUCrJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated microbatch-under-oil phase diagrams to rationalize serial crystallography sample preparation.IUCrJ · 2026Article
- Single-cell structural biology with intracellular electron crystallography.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Strategies for mitigating radiation damage and improving data completeness in 3D electron diffraction of protein crystals.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in macromolecular crystallography, driven by improved sources and cryocooling techniques, have enabled the use of increasingly smaller crystals for structure determination, with microfocus beamlines now widely accessible. Initially developed for challenging samples, these techniques have culminated in advanced beamlines such as VMXm. Here, an in vacuo sample environment improves the signal-to-noise ratio in X-ray diffraction experiments, and thus enables the use of submicrometre crystals. The advancement of techniques such as microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) for atomic-level insights into charged states and hydrogen positions, along with room-temperature crystallography to observe physiological states via serial crystallography, has driven a resurgence in the use of microcrystals. Reproducibly preparing small crystals, especially from samples that typically yield larger crystals, requires considerable effort, as no one singular approach guarantees optimal crystals for every technique. This review discusses methods for generating such small crystals, including mechanical crushing and batch crystallization with seeding, and evaluates their compatibility with microcrystal data-collection modalities. Additionally, we examine sample-delivery methods, which are crucial for selecting appropriate crystallization strategies. Establishing reliable protocols for sample preparation and delivery opens new avenues for macromolecular crystallography, particularly in the rapidly progressing field of time-resolved crystallography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.