Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40080159›Full record

ReviewIUCrJ2025

Small but mighty: the power of microcrystals in structural biology.

Courtney J Tremlett, Jack Stubbs, William S Stuart, Patrick D Shaw Stewart, Jonathan West, Allen M Orville, Ivo Tews, Nicholas J Harmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IUCrJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Courtney J TremlettLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7683-1124
Jack StubbsSchool of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3788-1687
William S StuartLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5560-1167
Patrick D Shaw StewartDouglas Instruments Ltd, East Garston, Hungerford RG17 7HD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0184-4083
Jonathan WestInstitute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5709-6790
Allen M OrvilleDiamond Light Source (United Kingdom), Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7803-1777
Ivo TewsSchool of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4704-1139
Nicholas J HarmerLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4073-0505

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009122/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S008470/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008768/1Defence Science and Technology Laboratory DSTLX1000167246Royal Society RSWFR2Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 210734/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in macromolecular crystallography, driven by improved sources and cryocooling techniques, have enabled the use of increasingly smaller crystals for structure determination, with microfocus beamlines now widely accessible. Initially developed for challenging samples, these techniques have culminated in advanced beamlines such as VMXm. Here, an in vacuo sample environment improves the signal-to-noise ratio in X-ray diffraction experiments, and thus enables the use of submicrometre crystals. The advancement of techniques such as microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) for atomic-level insights into charged states and hydrogen positions, along with room-temperature crystallography to observe physiological states via serial crystallography, has driven a resurgence in the use of microcrystals. Reproducibly preparing small crystals, especially from samples that typically yield larger crystals, requires considerable effort, as no one singular approach guarantees optimal crystals for every technique. This review discusses methods for generating such small crystals, including mechanical crushing and batch crystallization with seeding, and evaluates their compatibility with microcrystal data-collection modalities. Additionally, we examine sample-delivery methods, which are crucial for selecting appropriate crystallization strategies. Establishing reliable protocols for sample preparation and delivery opens new avenues for macromolecular crystallography, particularly in the rapidly progressing field of time-resolved crystallography.

Indexed as

CrystallographyCrystallizationCrystallography, X-RaymicrocrystalsMicroEDphase diagramssample deliverysample preparationseedingserial crystallographytime-resolved studies

Identifiers

PMID40080159
PMCPMC12044856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.