ArticleSkeletal radiology2025
Diffuse type tenosynovial giant cell tumour in the sinus tarsi in a paediatric patient: a rare case report with radiological and histopathological analysis.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a unique case of diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TSGCT) in the tarsal sinus of a paediatric patient. TSGCTs are uncommon in the foot and ankle with potential misdiagnosis as more common lesions such as ganglionic cysts. There have only been three cases of sinus tarsi TSGCTs reported in the literature, and this is the first report describing the diffuse subtype (D-TSGCT) in this location. The patient presented with ankle swelling. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a focal nodular lesion in the sinus tarsi, demonstrating low T1/T2 signals with striking blooming artefacts, and indistinct margins with infiltrative nodular deposits upon careful scrutiny. Histopathological examination showed distinctive features of D-TSGCT including haemosiderin deposition, multinodular infiltrative growth pattern and villous architecture. D-TSGCT is more extensive, aggressive, and with higher recurrence rates than the more common localised type (L-TSGCT). Despite the described morphological differences in the literature, imaging alone is not always discriminatory. The presenting case demonstrates the diagnostic challenge of an extra-articular mass-like D-TSGCT mimicking L-TSGCT, reviewing existing radiological knowledge translated from its pathological features and highlighting the importance of comprehensive imaging and histological evaluation. Assessing for the striking blooming of low T1 and T2 signals, lack of peripheral hypointense capsule, indistinct margins as well as multinodular infiltration along the synovium and adjacent soft tissue structures may help distinguish it from the localised type. This report also underscores the need to consider TSGCT as a differential even in atypical anatomical sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40080140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.