Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40080133›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Innovative training concepts in urology].

Ulrike Hendrika Necknig, Nadim Moharam, Nicola Edith von Ostau

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulrike Hendrika NecknigInstitut für Medizindidaktik, LMU München, München, Deutschland. necknig@yahoo.de.
Nadim MoharamKlinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Nicola Edith von OstauKlinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Uroonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the ageing population continues to grow, the need for treatment in urology is increasing. In order to be able to rely on well-trained urologists in the future, innovative training concepts are needed that take current and future developments into account. MATERIAL AND

methodOverview of existing innovative training concepts in the field of urology and newer training approaches.

resultsOverall, innovative training concepts in urology training offer promising prospects for the future. By combining technology, interdisciplinary learning and a focus on personal development, urologists can be optimally prepared for the challenges of modern medicine.

Indexed as

InventionsUrologyCurriculumForecastingHumansE‑learningMentoringPhysician shortagesSimulationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40080133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.