ReviewInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Magnetic Resonance Urogram in Pediatric Urology: a Comprehensive Review of Applications and Advances.
Review in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How we do it: functional magnetic resonance urography in congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance urography in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: evaluating changes in anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis following furosemide administration.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Telesurgery in Urology is the Hot Topic in this Number of International Brazilian Journal of Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU) has emerged as a powerful imaging modality in pediatric urology, offering comprehensive anatomical and functional assessment of the urinary tract without exposure to ionizing radiation. This review provides an in-depth analysis of MRU's technical aspects, clinical applications, advantages, and recent advancements. Traditional imaging techniques, such as ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography, and nuclear scintigraphy, have long been utilized for evaluating pediatric urinary tract anomalies; however, these methods have inherent limitations in anatomical resolution and functional assessment. MRU combines high-resolution anatomical imaging with dynamic functional analysis, making it particularly valuable in evaluating conditions such as hydronephrosis, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, and ectopic ureters. Advancements in MRU technology, including the use of 3T MRI for superior spatial resolution, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, have enhanced its diagnostic capabilities. The ability to assess renal transit times and differential renal function allows for precise evaluation of obstructive uropathies and congenital anomalies. Despite requiring sedation in younger children and longer acquisition times, MRU has demonstrated superior accuracy compared to conventional imaging, reducing the need for multiple diagnostic studies. Recent developments in real-time MRI, faster imaging techniques, and AI-based reconstructions have further optimized MRU's efficiency and diagnostic utility. As MRU continues to evolve, its role in pediatric urology is expected to expand, potentially replacing traditional imaging modalities in select cases. This review highlights the growing significance of MRU in pediatric urinary tract evaluation, emphasizing its potential to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.