ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Circulating Immune Features Synergizing Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Prediction of Poor Survival of Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Thermal Ablation.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and AimPredictors of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and traditional clinical variables for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis after locoregional therapies were useful while exhibited modest prognostic performances. We dig out the potential of circulating immune features for HCC prognosis prediction.Methods244 patients with early-stage HCC who were treated with thermal ablation and performed the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) tests were included. Patients were randomly assigned in 3:1 ratio to discovery (n = 183) and validation (n = 62) sets. Three models, including clinical (Clin-model), NLR-Clin-model and Immune-NLR-Clin-model were constructed using Cox regression model. Concordance index (c-index), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used for performance evaluation.ResultsThe Immune-NLR-Clin-model exhibited the best performance of 0.706 (95% CI:0.644-0.768) and 0.702 (95% CI:0.566-0.837) in discovery and validation sets, respectively. At 36-month prediction, the IDI and continuous-NRI show trend of improvement, with the IDI was 0.050 (95%CI: -0.5%-12.5%) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.