Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40079681›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025

The impact of extended invitation intervals on stage distribution of screen-detected and interval cancer within the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program.

Maria-Alexandra Katsara, Danica van den Berg, Manon C W Spaander, Adriana J van Vuuren, Evelien Dekker, Folkert J van Kemenade, Iris D Nagtegaal, Monique E van Leerdam, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Esther Toes-Zoutendijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria-Alexandra KatsaraDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-8124-8946
Danica van den BergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Manon C W SpaanderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Adriana J van VuurenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Evelien DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre - Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Folkert J van KemenadeDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris D NagtegaalDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Monique E van LeerdamDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris Lansdorp-VogelaarDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-2753
Esther Toes-ZoutendijkDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4001-2949

Funding

Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of extended invitation intervals on the stage distribution of screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRCs) in the Netherlands' fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from individuals with negative FIT results in 2017-2019 and subsequent screening round in 2019-2021, we examined whether delays of up to 6 months affected CRC stage at diagnosis. We performed multivariate logistic regression to assess the association between invitation intervals and cancer stage. Our analysis found no significant difference in stage distribution for both screen-detected and interval CRCs despite the delays. Specifically, odds ratios for late-stage cancer remained close to 1 across various intervals, indicating minimal impact of extended invitation times. These results suggest that the short-term delays caused by the pandemic did not significantly affect the performance of the CRC screening program. This highlights the program's ability to adapt to temporary disruptions while maintaining effective early cancer detection. Our findings support the notion that such disruptions, when managed appropriately, do not substantially compromise the quality of screening outcomes, reinforcing the resilience and flexibility of CRC screening programs in the face of health crises.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCOVID-19Early Detection of CancerAgedFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsOccult BloodSARS-CoV-2Time Factorscolorectal cancer (CRC)COVID‐19delayed screening intervalsstage distribution

Identifiers

PMID40079681
PMCPMC12079620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.