ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Pattern Mixture Sensitivity Analyses via Multiple Imputations for Non-Ignorable Dropout in Joint Modeling of Cognition and Risk of Dementia.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivated by the Swedish Betula study, we consider the joint modeling of longitudinal memory assessments and the hazard of dementia. In the Betula data, the time-to-dementia onset or its absence is available for all participants, while some memory measurements are missing. In longitudinal studies of aging, one cannot rule out the possibility of dropout due to health issues resulting in missing not at random longitudinal measurements. We, therefore, propose a pattern-mixture sensitivity analysis for missing not-at-random data in the joint modeling framework. The sensitivity analysis is implemented via multiple imputation as follows: (i) multiply impute missing not at random longitudinal measurements under a set of plausible pattern-mixture imputation models that allow for acceleration of memory decline after dropout, (ii) fit the joint model to each imputed longitudinal memory and time-to-dementia dataset, and (iii) combine the results of step (ii). Our work illustrates that sensitivity analyses via multiple imputations are an accessible, pragmatic method to evaluate the consequences of missing not at-random data on inference and prediction. This flexible approach can accommodate a range of models for the longitudinal and event-time processes. In particular, the pattern-mixture modeling approach provides an accessible way to frame plausible missing not at random assumptions for different missing data patterns. Applying our approach to the Betula study shows that worse memory levels and steeper memory decline were associated with a higher risk of dementia for all considered scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.