ArticleInternational journal of environmental health research2025
Characterizing air pollution exposure methodologies in rhinology: a scoping review.
Article in International journal of environmental health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ABST RACTCharacterization of air pollution assessment methodologies in rhinologic disease research is lacking. A scoping review was thus conducted to survey exposure methods in studies examining common rhinologic conditions: allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Several medical databases were queried for variables relating to (1) adults with a diagnosis of CRS or AR and (2) air pollution exposure. Data was extracted for pollutants assessed, method of quantifying exposure, assessment of residential stability, inclusion of authors with expertise in environmental exposure assessment, and disease-related outcomes. Thirty-four articles were included for analysis - 16 for AR and 18 for CRS. Fifteen studies originated from East Asia, 10 from North America, and 6 from Europe. The most common pollutant studied was PM2.5 (28 studies), with most studies investigating multiple pollutants. Twenty-one studies used a nearby air monitor to quantify exposure, 9 studies reported whether subjects had residential stability for the period assessed, and 17 studies included authors with climate science background. Timeframes included both acute and chronic exposure. Current methods to quantify air pollution exposure in rhinology vary considerably and inconsistently employ expertise from environmental scientists. Future investigations may benefit from multidisciplinary collaboration, reporting of residential stability, and standardized reporting metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.