ArticleJournal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists2026
Use of the Electrified Wire Technique for In Situ Fenestration Creation Within a Branch Bridging Stent.
Article in Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of cutting ballon versus plain balloon dilatation after electrified wire in situ fenestration.JVS-vascular science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo present the use of the electrified wire technique as bailout for target vessel (TV) branch preservation after unintended coverage by a bridging stent during branched endovascular repair (bEVAR). TECHNIQUE: A 73-year-old male, previously treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair and Provisional Extension to Induce Complete Attachment Technique (PETTICOAT) for type B aortic dissection, presented with a 68 mm type V thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The patient presented an anatomic variation with a common trunk for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac artery (CA). After a previously failed open surgical attempt, a triple-branch custom-made device (2 renal branches and 1 for the SMA/CA trunk) was chosen. Endograft deployment and TV catheterization were uneventful, until an unintended coverage of the CA occurred, due to bridging stent unmount. Using the electrified wire technique, an in situ fenestration was created into the CA/SMA trunk covered bridging stent to preserve CA patency. A bare metal stent was used for CA revascularization. Renal arteries were catheterized and bridged as planned. The 6-month computed tomography angiography confirmed TV patency.
conclusionThe electrified wire technique may be used as bailout for in situ fenestration creation in unintended coverage of early TV side-branches.Clinical ImpactAnatomic variations may increase the technical complexity of branched endovascular aortic repair while technical pitfalls related to target vessel preservation may demand the application of bailout techniques. In this case, the electrified wire technique was used to create an in situ fenestration within the bridging stent of a celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery common trunk (anatomic variation), after bridging stent unmount during advancement and CA unintended coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.