Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Multicenter Experience With a Novel Real-Time 3-Dimensional Intracardiac Echocardiography Catheter to Guide Interventional Cardiac Procedures.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intracardiac Echocardiography during Invasive Electrophysiological Procedures: a Scientific Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC, and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Intracardiac Echocardiography in Structural Heart Interventions: A Comprehensive Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent technologies enable real-time 3-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) with the advantages of 2-dimensional ICE and imaging capabilities of transesophageal echocardiography. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the real-world, multicenter safety and performance of a novel 3-dimensional ICE system in a variety of cardiac interventions used in standard clinical practice.
methodsThis prospective, multicenter, observational, single-arm study enrolled patients who were scheduled for an invasive cardiac procedure involving guidance with ICE and followed until discharge or ≤48 hours postprocedure. Intracardiac imaging was performed with the 3-dimensional ICE catheter, VeriSight Pro (Philips Inc.). Fluoroscopy was used in all cases and transesophageal echocardiography was used in some cases. The primary safety end point was device-related adverse events. The primary efficacy end point included technical success, imaging success, and clinical success.
resultsBetween October 2021 and November 2022, 155 patients were enrolled and screened. Percutaneous interventions performed included atrial septal defect/patent foramen ovale closures, left atrial appendage occlusion, catheter ablations, and valve procedures. No adverse events were related to the device or procedure. The technical, imaging, and clinical success rates were 98.7% (95% CI, 95.4%-99.8%), 96.1% (95% CI, 91.8%-98.6%), 94.8% (95% CI, 91.8%-98.6%), respectively. Overall, the VeriSight Pro ICE image quality was assessed to be "acceptable" or greater in relation to reference image modality among 96.2% (149 of 155) of procedures.
conclusionsVeriSight ICE imaging is safe and effective in the guidance of a wide variety of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures and has provided successful and high-quality imaging of cardiac structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.