ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Predicting differentially methylated cytosines in TET and DNMT3 knockout mutants via a large language model.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for comprehensive DNA methylation analysis: overview, challenges, and future directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation is an epigenetic marker that directly or indirectly regulates several critical cellular processes. While cytosines in mammalian genomes generally maintain stable methylation patterns over time, other cytosines that belong to specific regulatory regions, such as promoters and enhancers, can exhibit dynamic changes. These changes in methylation are driven by a complex cellular machinery, in which the enzymes DNMT3 and TET play key roles. The objective of this study is to design a machine learning model capable of accurately predicting which cytosines have a fluctuating methylation level [hereafter called differentially methylated cytosines (DMCs)] from the surrounding DNA sequence. Here, we introduce L-MAP, a transformer-based large language model that is trained on DNMT3-knockout and TET-knockout data in human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate the high accuracy of L-MAP in predicting DMCs. Our experiments also explore whether a classifier trained on human knockout data could predict DMCs in the mouse genome (and vice versa), and whether a classifier trained on DNMT3 knockout data could predict DMCs in TET knockouts (and vice versa). L-MAP enables the identification of sequence motifs associated with the enzymatic activity of DNMT3 and TET, which include known motifs but also novel binding sites that could provide new insights into DNA methylation in stem cells. L-MAP is available at https://github.com/ucrbioinfo/dmc_prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.