Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40079242›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of hematology2025

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Myelofibrosis and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Contemporary Review.

Nico Gagelmann, Nicolaus Kröger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Allogeneic Transplant for CMML.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nico GagelmannDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0891-1744
Nicolaus KrögerDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potentially curative therapy for patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and myelofibrosis (MF) and is the standard care for eligible patients with higher-risk disease. Despite significant advancements, both diseases pose unique challenges due to their clinical and molecular heterogeneity, necessitating personalized approaches to patient selection, timing, and transplant management. For MDS, genomic profiling has revolutionized prognostic frameworks such as IPSS-M, enabling tailored therapeutic decisions. In MF, driver mutations (e.g., JAK2, CALR, MPL) and additional high-risk molecular markers provide critical insights into disease biology and transplant outcomes. Optimal timing of HCT is critical, and recent models might help personalize treatment approaches. Molecular measurable residual disease monitoring has demonstrated prognostic value in both diseases, guiding preemptive strategies to mitigate relapse risk. Harnessing molecular technologies, clinical expertise, patient-centered decision-making, and innovative pharmaceutical strategies offers an exciting opportunity to shape a transformative and curative treatment framework. Here, we provide a contemporary review on HCT for MDS and MF, highlighting up-to-date insights into disease biology, standard of care, and recommendations, as well as open avenues.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMyelodysplastic SyndromesPrimary MyelofibrosisAllograftsHumansMutationNeoplasm, ResidualTransplantation, Homologousbusulfanmyelofibrosistransplantationtreosulfan

Identifiers

PMID40079242
PMCPMC12067163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.