ArticleJournal of biophotonics2025
Optomechanical Properties of Swine Skin Tissue Treated With a Nontoxic Optical Clearing Agent.
Article in Journal of biophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rheology-driven penetration dynamics of needle-free jet injection in ex vivo porcine tissue.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Optomechanical Properties of Swine Skin Tissue Treated With a Nontoxic Optical Clearing Agent.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the optomechanical and structural properties of individual macroscopic layers in swine skin tissues treated with a nontoxic optical clearing agent. The clearing agent was prepared by dissolving 2,2'-thiodiethanol in a phosphate-buffered solution and applied for up to 6 days. Prolonged clearing increased both the total and unscattered transmittance. Peaks associated with deoxygenated hemoglobin, oxygenated hemoglobin, and water showed marked reduction with extended clearing times. Histopathological examination revealed no significant structural alterations. A clearing time of approximately 4-5 days is recommended for optimal imaging, as it minimizes changes in mechanical properties. These findings support the use of optical clearing in deep tissue imaging, particularly when preserving macroscopic mechanical properties is essential, despite the inherent limitation of sample opacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.