Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40079195›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2025

New Opportunities or More of the Same? Health Industry Entrants in the Post-Pandemic Era.

Kyla F Woodward, LaTonya Trotter, Janette Dill, Bianca Frogner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyla F WoodwardUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6718-2676
LaTonya TrotterUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8053-0882
Janette DillUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4044-3127
Bianca FrognerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5120-1828

Funding

RiNGH (Research in Nursing & Global Health) Training ProgramT32NR019761 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KOHLER, PAMELA, PINTYE, JILLIAN · 2021 to 2025
$1.4M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR019761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examines shifts in health industry entry and sector choice among women, racially minoritized workers, and immigrants during the pandemic era. Using data from the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey (2018-2023), we compare entrant characteristics before and during the pandemic era, focusing on demographic composition and sector choice. Results show minimal shifts by gender, race, or education but highlight a rise in entrants from outside the labor force, particularly among White women and racially minoritized men. There were changes in sector choice: ambulatory care saw the greatest increase in racially minoritized entrants, with small increases for hospitals and a decrease for long-term care. Despite these sector-specific shifts, overall opportunities for minoritized workers did not expand, nor did workforce diversity significantly improve. These findings underscore the need for research that examines how policies outside the workplace shape worker behavior, particularly among marginalized groups.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Care SectorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsUnited Statesdiversityhealth care industryhealth care workforcejob mobilityrecruitment

Identifiers

PMID40079195
PMCPMC12197824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.