Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40079117›Full record

ReviewCirculation2025

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Leland E Hull, Aaron W Aday, Quan M Bui, Jasmine A Luzum, James M Muchira, Hannah Wand, C Anwar A Chahal, Mina K Chung, Anne E Kwitek, Silvana Molossi and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decision-making criteria in polygenic embryo screening: A survey of reproductive medicine physicians.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. What Should a Clinical Cardiologist Know About Cardiogenetics?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leland E Hull
Aaron W Aday
Quan M Bui
Jasmine A Luzum
James M Muchira
Hannah Wand
C Anwar A Chahal
Mina K Chung
Anne E Kwitek
Silvana Molossi
Pradeep Natarajan
American Heart Association Data Science and Precision Medicine Committee of the Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine and Council of Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease

Funding

Elucidating the barriers and facilitators to widespread implementation of preconception genetic carrier screeningK08HG012221 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HULL, LELAND · 2022 to 2025
$883k
Precision Medicine for Heart Failure: The Role of Genomics in the Efficacy and Racial Disparity of Cornerstone PharmacotherapyK08HL146990 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUZUM, JASMINE A · 2019 to 2023
$772k
NHGRI NIH HHS K08 HG012221NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL146990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite insufficient evidence to support direct-to-consumer genetic testing in routine clinical care, cardiovascular clinicians increasingly face questions about its utility and interpretation because individuals can purchase these tests directly from laboratories. A burgeoning marketplace offers an expanding array of testing options. In many cases, direct-to-consumer genetic testing advertises information that could inform one's risk of heritable disease, including insight into having a genetic predisposition to cardiovascular disease or data about gene-drug interactions that could affect response to cardiovascular medications. Navigating clinical questions about direct-to-consumer genetic testing involves understanding the evolution and oversight of the marketplace; the scope of direct-to-consumer genetic testing offerings; and the risks, benefits, and limitations of said testing. In this American Heart Association scientific statement, we summarize the state of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing industry, review types of cardiovascular genetic information that may be included in direct-to-consumer genetic testing, describe approaches to evaluate test quality, and provide resources for clinicians navigating questions about direct-to-consumer genetic testing. If direct-to-consumer genetic test information is used in clinical care, care should be taken to assess the limitations of the test, to contextualize the information specifically to the patient, and to corroborate potentially actionable monogenic findings.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDirect-To-Consumer Screening and TestingGenetic TestingAmerican Heart AssociationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansUnited StatesAHA Scientific Statementscardiovascular diseasesclinical laboratory servicesgenetic predisposition to diseasegenetic testing

Identifiers

PMID40079117
PMCPMC12093157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.