ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Prolene suture-assisted cystoscopic removal of double J ureteral stents in infants.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the prolene suture-assisted cystoscopic removal of double J ureteral stents in infants and summarize the safety, operability, and effectiveness of this approach. Methods: The clinic data of patients who underwent double J ureteral stent removal by prolene suture-assisted cystoscopy were reviewed. The operation procedure was as follows: First, a folded 4-0 prolene suture was preset into the cystoscope sheath, and the telescope was placed. Second, the cystoscopy was performed by inserting the cystoscope into the urinary bladder and finding the end of the double J ureteral stent under cystoscopy. Subsequently, the folded suture was pushed out of the sheath to form a coil that was used to hook 1-2 cm of the end of the stent. Finally, the stent was caught by tightening the prolene coil while the cystoscope was retracted into the cystoscope sheath; the removal was accompanied by exiting the cystoscope. Cystoscopy was repeated to confirm no additional damage. Results: Overall, 15 double J ureteral stents were retrieved in 15 infants, whose average age was 3.78 ± 1.2 months, average weight was 5,951 ± 797 g, average residence time of the stents in the ureter was 31.20 ± 2.14 days, and the average operation time was 3.5 ± 1.2 min. No complications, such as urethral injury, occurred during the operation. Conclusions: Prolene suture-assisted cystoscopy is one of the simple, safe, and effective technique for the removal of double J ureteral stents, especially suitable for infants or patient in whom the grasping forceps cannot pass through the matching cystoscope sheath.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.