Article in MycoKeys, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Wei-Xin ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences Guangzhou China.
Wang-Qiu DengState Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture, Collection and Application, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
Chang-Qing ChangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences Guangzhou China.
Ping ZhouGuangdong Nanling Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Nanling Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station Guangzhou China.
Min LinState Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture, Collection and Application, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
Ming ZhangState Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture, Collection and Application, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6420-2531
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Three new species of
Indexed as
New taxaphylogenetic analysisPorotheleaceaetaxonomy
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Three new species of · full record | OpenQuestion