ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
ARHGAP25: a novel player in the Pathomechanism of allergic contact hypersensitivity.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated study of DNA methylation and transcriptome: a new perspective for exploring the pathogenesis of Sjögren's syndrome.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Contact hypersensitivity (CHS), or allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), is an inflammatory skin disorder characterized by an exaggerated allergic reaction to specific haptens. During this delayed-type allergic reaction, the first contact with the allergen initiates the sensitization phase, forming memory T cells. Upon repeated contact with the hapten, the elicitation phase develops, activating mostly macrophages, cytotoxic T cells, and neutrophilic granulocytes. Our group previously demonstrated that the leukocyte-specific GTPase-activating protein ARHGAP25 regulates phagocyte effector functions and is crucial in the pathomechanism of autoantibody-induced arthritis. Here, we investigate its role in the pathogenesis of the more complex inflammatory process of contact hypersensitivity. Methods: For sensitization, the abdomens of wild-type and ARHGAP25 deficient (KO) mice on a C57BL/6 background, as well as bone marrow chimeric mice, were coated with 3% TNCB (2-chloro-1,3,5-trinitrobenzene) or acetone in the control group. After five days, ears were treated with 1% TNCB for elicitation. Swelling of the ears caused by edema formation was evaluated by measuring the ear thickness. Afterward, ears were harvested, and histological analysis, investigation of leukocyte infiltration, cytokine production, and changes in relevant signaling pathways were carried out. ARHGAP25 expression at the mRNA and protein levels was measured using murine ear and human skin samples. Results: ARHGAP25 expression increased in human patients suffering from contact dermatitis and in contact hypersensitivity induced in mice. Our data suggest that ARHGAP25 expression is infinitesimal in keratinocytes. In the CHS mouse model, the absence of ARHGAP25 mitigated the severity of inflammation in a leukocyte-dependent manner by reducing the infiltration of phagocytes and cytotoxic T cells. ARHGAP25 altered cytokine composition in the sensitization and elicitation phase of the disease. However, this protein did not affect T cell homing and activation in the sensitization phase. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that ARHGAP25 is essential in developing contact hypersensitivity by modulating the cytokine environment and leukocyte infiltration. Based on these findings, we propose ARHGAP25 as a promising candidate for future therapeutic approaches and a potential ACD biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.