ArticleDrugs in context2025
Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Article in Drugs in context, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-year multicenter prospective real-world study of vericiguat effectiveness and safety in Spain.ESC heart failure · 2026Observational
- Efficacy and Safety of Vericiguat in a Real-life Population with Heart Failure after 1 Year of Treatment: The VERITA Study.Cardiac failure review · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a narrative review of real-world evidence studies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This analysis assesses the effectiveness and tolerability profile of vericiguat in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, with an emphasis on the emergence of ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with HFrEF and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator who started treatment with vericiguat in daily clinical practice in a tertiary university hospital in Spain. Results: The study population comprised 14 patients treated since January 2023. At baseline, mean age was 77.0±7.0 years, 71.4% of patients were men and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 32.1±5.4%. Regarding heart failure treatments, 13 (92.3%) patients were prescribed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, mainly sacubitril-valsartan (61.5%), they were all prescribed aldosterone antagonists, 10 (71.4%) were prescribed β-blockers and 10 (71.4%) were prescribed sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. After a mean duration of treatment with vericiguat of 12.4±5.3 months, two (14.3%) patients presented to the emergency department, one with hypotension and the other with impaired kidney function, and a further two (14.3%) patients were hospitalised, one of whom had decompensated heart failure. At baseline, four (28.6%) patients presented non-sustained/sustained ventricular tachycardia; at study end, this decreased to two patients (50% of patients with ventricular arrhythmias at baseline). Additionally, in one patient (25% of patients with ventricular arrhythmias at baseline), there was a substantial reduction in the number of episodes of ventricular arrhythmia. At study end, seven patients achieved the target dose of 10 mg daily and one patient discontinued vericiguat owing to hypotension. Conclusions: Amongst patients with HFrEF and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, vericiguat showed a good safety profile in addition to standard heart failure therapy, with low rates of adverse events. Moreover, a potential reduction in the risk of ventricular arrhythmias could also be obtained with vericiguat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.