Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078937›Full record

ArticleCambridge prisms. Extinction2025

Extinction studies in focus: Reflections on photography at a time of ecological decline.

Kate Simpson, Sarah Oakes, Aureja Stirbyte, Katie Prosser, Timothy M Brown, Jonathan David Roberts, Amy J Bartlett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cambridge prisms. Extinction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. An interdisciplinary approach to improving conservation outcomes for parasites.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kate SimpsonSchool of English, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9414-9937
Sarah OakesSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Aureja StirbyteSchool of Sociology & Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Katie ProsserSchool of Philosophy, Religion, and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8913-6268
Timothy M BrownSchool of Philosophy, Religion, and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5508-7623
Jonathan David RobertsSchool of History, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-1491
Amy J BartlettSchool of Languages, Cultures & Societies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through compositional inclusion or exclusion, the photograph can assert and communicate what belongs in a picture, in a landscape, in an ecosystem. It can illuminate what we deem conservation-worthy, or, on a larger scale, which extinctions are attention-worthy. Photographic practice helps to illuminate the active nature of extinction, and our choices as actors and witnesses within that process. Here, researchers from the University of Leeds' Extinction Studies Doctoral Training Programme present individual reflections on interdisciplinary practice-led research in the Scottish Small Isles. We consider how photography, as a form of praxis, can generate new forms of knowledge surrounding extinction: its meanings, representations, and legacies, particularly through visual representation. We offer seven perspectives on contemporary image-making, from disciplines including philosophy, conservation biology, literature, sociology, geology, cultural anthropology, and palaeontology. Researchers gathered experiential, ethical, even biological meanings from considering what to include or exclude in images: from the micro to the macro, the visible to the invisible, the aesthetic to the ecological. We draw conclusions around meaning-making through the process of photography itself, and the tensions encountered through framing and decision-making in a time of mass ecological decline.

Indexed as

conservationcultural extinctiondeclinesEnvironmental photographyextinction aestheticsinterdisciplinaritypractice-led researchtaxonomic bias

Identifiers

PMID40078937
PMCPMC11895400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.