Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078913›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Comparison of the behaviour of pro-oxidant additive containing plastic degradation in the unmanaged natural environment and in the laboratory.

Fabiola Sciscione, Luba Prout, Jack W E Jeffries, Hajar J Karam, Achilleas Constantinou, Fei Peng, S M Al-Salem, Helen C Hailes, Mark Miodownik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabiola SciscioneUCL Plastic Waste Innovation Hub, University College London, London, UK.
Luba ProutUCL Plastic Waste Innovation Hub, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3520-8410
Jack W E JeffriesUCL Plastic Waste Innovation Hub, University College London, London, UK.
Hajar J KaramEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Centre, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), P.O. Box 24885, Safat 13109, Kuwait.
Achilleas ConstantinouDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3036, Cyprus.
Fei PengMechanical Engineering Department, University College London, London, UK.
S M Al-SalemEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Centre, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), P.O. Box 24885, Safat 13109, Kuwait.
Helen C HailesUCL Plastic Waste Innovation Hub, University College London, London, UK.
Mark MiodownikUCL Plastic Waste Innovation Hub, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0931-3030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pro-oxidant additive containing (PAC) plastics are designed to degrade in the unmanaged natural environment through oxidation and biological processes. In 2020, the British Standard Institution published the PAS 9017:2020 standard designed to ensure that PAC plastic tested under a specific set of protocols would successfully biodegrade in the environment. In this article, we compare the outcomes of laboratory tests carried out according to PAS 9017:2020 with field tests in an open unmanaged environment in the UK over 24 months. We report that the PAC cups were intact after 24 months and did not undergo significant abiotic degradation nor biodegradation during field tests. The PAC cups did undergo rapid abiotic degradation during accelerated UV laboratory tests, however the carbonyl index never reached 1.0. The molecular weight of the PAC cups decreased throughout the field trials and during the laboratory tests but neither satisfied the requirements stated in PAS 9017:2020. Earthworm avoidance tests and earthworm reproduction tests carried out in artificial soil showed no significant adverse effects or impact on the microbial community. We conclude that PAS 9017:2020 does not predict the real-world behaviour of the PAC plastics we tested in the open unmanaged environment in the temperate climate of the UK.

Indexed as

field trialsmicroplasticsoxo-biodegradableoxo-degradablePAS 9017pro-oxidants

Identifiers

PMID40078913
PMCPMC11896698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.