ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Environmental Impact and Sustainability Associated with the Practice of Dermatology.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Environmental Determinants of Skin Health: Linking Climate Change, Air Pollution, and the Dermatologic Disease Burden.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The environmental impact of the practice of medicine, including dermatology, can be significant, driven by a growing and aging population that increasingly demands medical resources. This review explores the environmental effects of the practice of dermatology and identifies actionable solutions to reduce negative environmental impacts. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted using the terms ("environmental impact" OR "sustainability") AND "dermatology." Results were screened to include English-only articles between 2018 to 2024 and excluded duplicates. Further exploration of dermatology's environmental effects was enhanced through citation tracking and additional PubMed searches. Results: A total of 25 articles were included based on relevance and search terms and an additional 21 were added. Results were categorized into six categories for data representation. Patient travel was the largest contributor to negatively impact the environment, followed by waste management practices, journal publication and written patient material, and traveling to medical conferences. The environmental impact of pharmaceuticals, including topicals, is also notable. Potential sustainable alternatives include teledermatology, more appropriate waste production and segregation, and electronic versus printed formats and more virtual conferences. Additionally, dermatologic disease evolves in response to a changing environment, with new data indicating epidemiological shifts due to climate change. More sustainable practices within dermatology also have the potential to cut total overhead expenses. Conclusion: Clinical and surgical subspecialties, specifically dermatology, can contribute significantly to environmental pollution, leading to environmental and financial impacts, but implementing simple, documented methods can reduce their ecological footprint and provide potential financial benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40078861PMC11896619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.