ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Achievement of Optimal Treatment Targets with Oral Janus Kinase Inhibition in Elderly Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-world, Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of JAK Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis: A Global Bibliometric Analysis (2015-2025).Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Article
- Bidirectional Associations Between Seborrheic Dermatitis and Epithelial Barrier Diseases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have demonstrated high levels of efficacy with acceptable safety in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), yet there remains significant hesitancy among the dermatologic community to use JAKi in elderly populations due to the potential increased risk of serious adverse events in this population. We aimed to perform a retrospective review to describe real-world outcomes for the use of selective JAK-1 inhibitors in patients with AD aged 65 years or older. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review. AD cases were identified by ICD-10-CM codes L20.8/L20.89/L20.9. Patients aged 65 years or older years treated with a selective JAK-1 inhibitor were included. Body surface area (BSA), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) were collected and evaluated independently. Results: Thirty-eight AD cases in patients aged 65 years or older treated with a selective JAK-1 inhibitor were identified. Patients were aged 65 to 96 years, and treatment duration ranged from 4 to 28 months. Thirty-six out of 38 patients (94.7%) tolerated treatment well; one was switched to another JAKi due to mood lability and another paused therapy during hospitalization for septic pneumonia. Thirty-five out of 37 (94.6%) patients achieved an IGA of 0/1, 28/30 (93.3%) achieved an NRS of 0/1, and 30/30 (100%) had a peak pruritus response with improvement of ≥4 points on NRS. There were no clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities throughout the treatment course. No laboratory abnormality resulted in treatment discontinuation. Limitations: Limitations of this retrospective review include selection bias and missing data. Conclusion: We demonstrate the ability to achieve optimal treatment targets and safety of selective JAKi-1 inhibitors in elderly patients with AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40078855PMC11896624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.