Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078838›Full record

ArticleMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement2025

Using genomic selection to correct pedigree errors in kiwiberry breeding.

Daniel Mertten, Catherine M McKenzie, Susan Thomson, John McCallum, Dave Andersen, Samantha Baldwin, Michael Lenhard, Paul M Datson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel MerttenThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited (PFR), Auckland, 1142 New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0000-7131-825X
Catherine M McKenzieThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Te Puke, 3182 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3075-954X
Susan ThomsonThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Lincoln, 7608 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7127-9414
John McCallumThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Lincoln, 7608 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-6732
Dave AndersenThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Motueka, 7198 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9543-2900
Samantha BaldwinThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Lincoln, 7608 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8151-8850
Michael LenhardInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8661-6911
Paul M DatsonKiwifruit Breeding Centre, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In breeding programmes, accurate estimation of breeding values is crucial for selecting superior genotypes. Traditional methods rely on phenotypic observations and pedigree information to estimate variance components and heritability. However, pedigree errors can significantly affect the accuracy of these estimates, especially in long-lived perennial vines. This study evaluates the effect of pedigree errors on breeding value predictions in kiwiberry breeding and explores the benefits of using genomic selection. We applied Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) to estimate breeding values for each genotype for a given trait. Four scenarios with varying degrees of alteration in pedigree-based relationship matrices were used to represent inaccurate relationships between genotypes. Pedigree-based breeding values were compared with genomic estimated breeding values for one vine-related and four fruit-related quantitative traits. The results showed that as the degree of altered population structure increased, the prediction accuracy of pedigree-based breeding values decreased. In contrast, genomic selection, which uses marker inheritance, maintained realised relationships between genotypes, making it a more robust method for predicting genetic merit. In kiwiberries, as in all species of the genus Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11032-025-01552-6.

Indexed as

Best linear unbiased predictionBreeding valueDioeciousPedigree errorPrediction accuracy

Identifiers

PMID40078838
PMCPMC11896956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.